Data Confidence and Use

How is Waterwatch data used?
Waterwatch data is used by local councils, government agencies, researchers, and universities to inform waterway and catchment management across the region. It feeds into government policy, environmental reporting, and on-the-ground restoration work.
Records in database
77,000+
as of May 2026, growing monthly
Data spans back to
1995
for some sites in the catchment
Data types
3
water quality, waterbugs, riparian
Government & environmental reporting
Where it's used
Waterwatch data is embedded in several significant government frameworks and monitoring programs.
ACT State of the Environment
The Commissioner for Sustainability and the Environment uses CHIP data to assess changes in aquatic ecosystem health for their State of the Environment reports. View the 2019 ACT SoE report
ACT Wellbeing Framework
Waterwatch data contributes to the Healthy and resilient natural environment section of the ACT Wellbeing Framework, which measures 12 aspects of quality of life for Canberrans.
Icon Water — source water protection
Icon Water incorporates Waterwatch data in their 3-yearly Sanitary Survey reported to ACT Health, which assesses the condition of ACT drinking water catchments and potential contaminants.
ACT Government environmental monitoring
Waterwatch data is included in four ACT Government programs: the Biodiversity Research and Monitoring Program, the Conservation Effectiveness Monitoring Program, the ACT Integrated Water Monitoring Plan, and ACT Water Reports.
Data driving real-world change
$100,000 NSW Environment Trust Grant — Cooma Creek
Platypus survey data and CHIP report results from Cooma Creek underpinned a successful $100,000 grant application. The project engaged local schools, ran community field days, and delivered environmental restoration and rehabilitation work on the creek — improving water quality and habitat for platypus, rakali, frogs, and bird species in the catchment.

Want to explore the data yourself?
All Waterwatch records are publicly available through the Atlas of Living Australia database.

Is citizen science data trustworthy?
Citizen science data is often questioned for reliability. In 2013, the University of Canberra independently reviewed the quality of Waterwatch data to answer this directly.
The Waterwatch database provides a good quality baseline dataset for assessing water quality in the ACT and that where there has been sufficiently regular collection of data, it is possible to use Waterwatch data in an early warning context.
— ACT Waterwatch Data Review, University of Canberra, 2013
What Changed?
Improvements following the review
Before the review, data was fragmented across different sub-catchment databases, methods varied, and reporting was inconsistent. The review prompted a programme-wide overhaul.
Single unified database
All Waterwatch data consolidated into one public database, managed by the Atlas of Living Australia.
Revised site locations
Sites were reorganised for better catchment coverage, with long-term sites prioritised. Waterways were divided into "reaches" based on land use and significant confluences.
Expanded data collection
Monthly water quality surveys were combined with waterbug data (spring and autumn at key sites) and riparian vegetation and habitat surveys (all sites, biennial).
Annual CHIP report
All three data streams are now combined per reach in the yearly CHIP report, with individual reach report cards providing local context.
Annual quality assurance
Volunteers test "mystery solutions" each year to verify their techniques, kits, and equipment — keeping data standards consistent across the program.
Greater confidence, broader use
These changes have led to increased data confidence and the Waterwatch dataset is now actively used beyond the program itself.
See how Waterwatch data is being used
From research to environmental planning, our data is making an impact across the region.